ndian 2016 budget crisis and people’s victory: Employee Provident Fund tax free again


Indian 2016 budget crisis and people’s victory: Employee Provident Fund tax free again!

-Dr. Abdul Ruff

_________

 

Even though billed as pro-poor, Indian 2016 budget proposal to tax 60 per cent of the employee provident fund (EPF) corpus created a big hue and cry in the public. The issue got the prime attention of media as well and debates forced the Modi government to review the proposal and eventually withdraw it from the budgetary proposals  

Para 138 of Jaitley’s budget speech said: “In case of superannuation funds and recognised provident funds, including EPF, the same norm of 40 per cent of corpus to be tax free will apply in respect of corpus created out of contributions made after 1.4.2016.” Para 139 said: “Further, the annuity fund which goes to the legal heir after the death of pensioner will not be taxable in all three cases. Also, we are proposing a monetary limit for contribution of employer in recognised provident and superannuation fund of Rs 1.5 lakh per annum for taking tax benefit.”

The Modi has decided to review the proposal and decided the issue in favor of the public, which now thinks it for the first time won a major battle with the BJP that is wedded to anti-people  and corporate  promotional  policies s policies

Finance Minister of India Arun Jaitley who presented the  budget to earn the ire of the public, has now announced a rollback of his budget proposal to tax 60 per cent of the employee provident fund (EPF) corpus at the time of withdrawal and said that the government would do a “comprehensive review” of the proposal. This comes on the back of attacks from contributors, MPs and employee unions, including the BJP’s own trade union wing, the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh.

Making a suo motu statement in Lok Sabha, Jaitley also announced a rollback on the proposal that imposed a tax on the employer’s contribution of over Rs 1.5 lakh. “In view of the representations received, the government would like to do a comprehensive review of this proposal and, therefore, I withdraw the proposals made in para 138 and 139 of my budget speech. The proposal of 40 per cent exemption given to NPS subscribers at the time of withdrawal remains,” he said.

The budget announcement relating to EPF taxation drew strong criticism from the employees’ representatives on the board of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) and they threatened to hold nationwide agitation if the proposals were not rolled back.

In its defence of the proposal immediately after the budget, the Finance Ministry had maintained that out of around 3.7 crore contributing members of EPFO, nearly 3.26 crore subscribers were within the statutory wage limit of Rs 15,000 per month and for them, there wouldn’t be any change in the new dispensation.

Though the government clarified that the money would not attract tax if the contributor were to put 60 per cent of the corpus in annuity products of insurance companies, people opposed even this. “A number of representations have been received from various sections of the society including members of Parliament suggesting that this change will force people to invest in annuity products even if they are not willing to do so,” Jaitley said.

While parliamentarians stated that employees should have choice of where to invest, Jaitley said, “Theoretically, such freedom is desirable but it is important for the government to achieve policy objectives by the instrumentality of taxation.”

Arun also clarified that the policy objective is not to get more revenue but to encourage people to join the pension scheme. Even as he announced rollback of the proposal, the Finance Minister said that the purpose of the proposed reform in the tax regime was to encourage more number of private sector employees to go for pension security after retirement instead of withdrawing the entire money from the provident fund account.

People of India eventually felt sigh of great relief.

 

Advertisements
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: