Battle for White House: US corporate mafia is opposed to Sanders nomination!

Battle for White House: US corporate mafia is opposed to Sanders nomination!

-Dr. Abdul Ruff




Let alone allowing him to win the coveted US presidency,  the American corporate mafia that decide all major political matters in the tallest democracy of the universe do not let  Democratic Party  candidate Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders aspiring for the White House to control world affairs along with  fellow veto powers, to win the Democratic nomination in the first place.

The prime reason for his pathetic fate is his world view which looks at variance with that of other presidential candidates across the bi-party political spectrum in the USA.

Having lost a few primaries to his fellow and stronger competitor Hillary Clinton who is former US foreign minister under President Obama and wife of former Precedent Bill Clinton Sanders with ‘socialist’ orientation is coming under mounting pressure from Democratic Party and even sitting president Obama, who has claims as a ‘lefty’,  to back off from campaign and let former secretary of state Hillary Clinton emerge  as victorious candidate to be nominated by the Democratic Party for the elections.

Sanders who lost more primary debates than Hillary Clinton did is under tremendous pressure to abandon contest like good democratic boy.

Meanwhile, President Obama while addressing the Democratic Party donors at a fundraiser March 11 in Austin, Texas called on Democrats to begin uniting behind the party’s prospective nominee, assumed to be Clinton. His message is clear that sanders should not spoil Clinton’s chances and her long cherished and dreamt political ambitions to have the White House to pursue the Neocons militarism plus Zionist policies as America’s.

Barrack Obama said that Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont is nearing the point at which his campaign against Hillary Clinton would end, and that the party must soon come together to back Hillary. Obama privately tells the donors that time Is coming to unite behind Hillary Clinton.  However, Obama was careful not to name any names, so that White House spokesman Josh Earnest could confirm that Obama had discussed the presidential race with Democratic donors, while disavowing any explicit preference for Clinton. That is a White House lie.

Obama as the Democratic tactician in chief chose his words very carefully, and did not explicitly call on Socialite Sanders to quit the race, according to those in the room. Still, those in attendance said in interviews that they took his comments as a signal to  Sanders that perpetuating his campaign, which is now an uphill climb, could only help the Republicans recapture the White House, therefore, he must withdraw from the contest voluntarily and ‘gracefully’. This could be a presidential warning to him as well. .

Generally top politicians of every country communicate to search for a person as top ruler, president or Prime minister as the case may be at a given point of time and needs. Obama was preferred  by  the political class because of his Black background to pursue  the Neocons plan of wars in North African nations like Libya and accelerate terror wars launched by the republican Bush. .Now it is clear there is a consensus among leaders, present as well as past, to consider Hillary Clinton to be the first even woman president. What is happening now in primaries is a part of the official conspiracy.  If the voters eventually also would hail her, then the matter ends there. How she will function as US president remains to be watched.

Maybe there is no chance the Americans could be rescued from the impending disaster by supporting and promoting imperialist goals of corporate lords. . .

American political leaders, including lefty Obama,  are careful not to allow anyone without strong feeling for capitalism, militarism and imperialism to assume presidency which is  exclusively  “reserved” for those who would actively promote  aggressive  foreign policy,

In her unsuccessful contest with Obama in 2008, Mrs. Clinton consistently rejected suggestions that she could not overtake Obama’s early lead in delegates, and she remained in the race to the very last primary and caucus. The Clinton campaign has now been more cautious than the White House in pushing for an early end to the primary race.

Obama voted by absentee ballot in the Illinois primary, won narrowly by Clinton. The White House has refused to comment on which candidate he voted for, but his support for his former Secretary of State has been an open secret since last October, when Vice President Joe Biden decided not to enter the race. Upcoming contests in a series of less populous states, mostly in the West, would likely favor Sanders. The upcoming contests include Arizona, Utah and Idaho March 22 and Alaska, Hawaii and Washington March 26, then a ten-day break around Easter, followed by Wisconsin April 5 and Wyoming April 9. All but Arizona and Wisconsin are caucus states, where the Sanders campaign has usually had the advantage.

But his critics argue that Clinton’s lead, propelled by Obama and his supporters and media, was insurmountable, and a string of victories by Sen. Sanders over the next few weeks would have little impact on Sec. Clinton’s position in the race.

Obama supporters demand that Sanders carry out his “assigned role” in the presidential election: convincing his supporters, particularly among young energetically radical people, to back Clinton in the general election, despite the widespread lack of enthusiasm, and in many cases open hostility, towards her right-wing record as a defender of imperialist push by Bush and Wall Street, and advocate of American militarism, including the Iraq War.

Obama did not endorse Clinton overtly or name Sanders as the candidate, who should step back in favor of the frontrunner, but the implication was clear, especially given the timing of the remarks—delivered before the March 15 Clinton primary sweep, but not made public until two days after the vote.

US corporatist media outlets are doing considerable disservice to the nation by coercing Sanders to end his campaign and surrender before Clinton and Obama.


Sanders camp complained that the nomination campaign was only halfway completed, that there is still time for him to overtake Clinton’s lead of more than 300 convention delegates, and that millions more people should be given the opportunity to have a choice for the Democratic nomination.

What exactly does Obama mean by Sanders’ ‘“assigned role” in the election?  Possibly Sanders is fully conscious of the role he plays in American politics, using “socialist” rhetoric and occasional calls for “political revolution” to attract youth and working people, only to trap them within the confines of the Democratic Party and insure that there is no political challenge to the corporate-controlled two-party system.

If that is so, Sanders also is betraying  the Americans, the youth primarily, even his own socialist ideology, if he has one.

More significantly, Sanders emphasized that his campaign, win or lose, was good for the health of Democratic Party. Further, Sanders is eager to promote the possibility of having a large voter turnout in November.

Once Clinton is chosen to contest for the presidency the media attention would deflected to her main opponent Republican Trump in such way that the voters will have choose Hillary Clinton.

That is how US democracy functions. Everything is predetermined and meticulously planned and carefully executed literally everything, including the Sept11 hoax.



Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s