India out. GST war on islam. Islamist leader Abdelilah Benkirane as Morocco Premier (write to: abdulruff_jnu@yahoo.com)

India out.

GST war on islam.

Islamist leader Abdelilah Benkirane as Morocco Premier

-DR. ABDUL RUFF

abdulruff_jnu@yahoo.com

_________

Parliament in Rabat, Morocco, 20 November 2011

I – Poll

Moroccans have elected new lower house of parliament on 25 November, in the first national vote since the approval of constitutional reforms in July billed as laying the foundations for a fully-fledged constitutional monarchy. Moderate Islamists, as expected, did well the vote after a similar success in Tunisia’s first democratic election a month ago and the Justice and Development Party (PJD) emerged as the biggest party in Friday’s parliamentary elections.

The Justice and Development Party (PJD) took 107 seats out of the 395 in Parliament, almost twice as many as the second-place nationalist Istiqlal party, with 60 seats. The election was held more than a year early, after pro-democracy demonstrations swept the country earlier this year as part of the regionwide Arab Spring.

The leader of a moderate Islamist party Abdelilah Benkirane has been appointed by King Mohammed VI as Morocco’s new prime minister. Abdelilah will now hold talks on forming a coalition government.  His Justice and Development Party has not been in government before.

The PJD’s victory follows that of Tunisia’s Islamist Ennahda Party in an election there last month. Following elections, King Mohammed VI is for the first time obliged to choose the prime minister from the largest party, rather than naming whoever he pleases. King Mohammed received Benkirane, who is the PJD’s secretary general, in the mountain town of Midelt and named him head of government with the task of forming a new government.

Under a new constitution approved by referendum in July, the king has to choose a prime minister from the party that won the most seats. The constitution also gives the prime minister more powers to govern, but the king still has the final say on issues of defence, security and religion. The reforms were supported by all the main political parties, which called on their supporters to back the proposals in the referendum.

The 20 February movement, which spearheaded Morocco’s pro-democracy protests earlier this year, has called for a boycott of the elections, dismissing them as a “piece of theatre”. It says the constitutional changes approved in July are superficial, and perpetuate a “facade of democracy” that – it says – has disguised continuing royal rule for decades.

King Mohammed VI presented the constitutional changes as a far-reaching concession to Arab Spring-style pro-democracy protests, but activists believe they will do little to change the actual power structure and have called for a boycott of the elections. As a result of the constitutional changes approved by 98% of those voting in a 1 July referendum, the position of the prime minister, who must now be appointed from the largest party in parliament, has also been enhanced, gaining the authority to appoint government officials and dissolve parliament.  However, the parliament will have a greater share of power and – in theory – will play the leading role in a legislative process previously dominated by the king.

Benkirane, who was elected head of his party in 2008, leads its more pro-monarchy faction. He has repeatedly stated his support for a strong king, even though some of his colleagues would prefer a less powerful ruler. “The head of the state is king and no-one can govern without him,” he told supporters. The PJD has said it will promote Islamic finance. However, it has avoided focusing on issues such as alcohol and headscarves for women.

Many of the protesters who took to the streets in February feel the reforms still fall far short of their demands for a democratic, constitutional monarchy, and have called for a boycott. Ahead of the poll, the sleepy calm of the capital, Rabat, was occasionally punctuated by the marches of unemployed graduates. But the country’s powerful monarchy and the system that supports it appear to have averted any direct, mortal challenge for now.

A low turnout in the parliamentary poll would detract from the legitimacy of King Mohammed VI’s reforms and could hint at future problems.

II – Morocco

The Kingdom of Morocco is the most westerly of the North African countries known as the Maghreb. To the south, the status of Western Sahara remains unresolved. Morocco annexed the territory in 1975 and a guerrilla war with Algerian-backed pro-independence forces ended in 1991. UN efforts have failed to break the political deadlock. To the north, a dispute with Spain in 2002 over the tiny island of Perejil revived the issue of the sovereignty of Melilla and Ceuta. The small enclaves on the Mediterranean coast are surrounded by Morocco and have been administered by Madrid for centuries.

Strategically situated with both Atlantic and Mediterranean coastlines, but with a rugged mountainous interior, it stayed independent for centuries while developing a rich culture blended from Arab, Berber, European and African influences.  However, Morocco was a French protectorate from 1912 to 1956, when Sultan Mohammed became king. He was succeeded in 1961 by his son, Hassan II, who ruled for 38 years. He played a prominent role in the search for peace in the Middle East, given the large number of Israelis of Moroccan origin, but was criticized for suppressing domestic opposition. A truth commission set up to investigate human rights violations during Hassan’s reign confirmed nearly 10,000 cases, ranging from death in detention to forced exile. After his death in 1999 Hassan was succeeded by his son, who became King Mohammed VI and was seen as a modernizer. There has been some economic and social liberalization, but the monarch has retained sweeping powers.

King Mohammed is aided by a powerful propaganda machine – his image adorns streets and shops across the country. Central to the monarchical regime’s strength is its longevity – the Alaoui dynasty gained control of most of Morocco in 1664 – and its claim of descent from the Prophet Muhammad. The king has tremendous religious and political capital – it’s not just the king but the whole political establishment, the monarchy and the “makhzen” provide for the patronage network that embodies Morocco’s ruling elite.

Moroccan citizens, many of them poor and illiterate and living in rural areas, are made to believe that the monarch has a special gift or blessing and they feel that they have some psychological relationship with the king. Symbolic rituals also boost his status. In an annual ceremony of allegiance, the “bay’a”, Moroccan officials bow before the king as he parades on a horse.

Despite these traditional trappings, the monarchy under the 48-year-old king has taken on a more modern, reformist image. His father, Hassan II, ran a notoriously brutal regime between 1961 and 1999. Opponents were tortured and protests repressed.  1965, the interior minister at the time, Gen Mohammed Oufkir, supervised a crackdown on demonstrations in Casablanca from a helicopter while – according to one story – personally spraying rioters with a machine gun. But a process of gradual reform began in the final years of Hassan’s rule, and continued with his son. It included a family law that advanced women’s rights and a truth commission that explored abuses under King Hassan – though none of those responsible were prosecuted.

Along with Ennahda in Tunisia and the Justice and Development Party (AKP) in Turkey, it places itself within a contemporary movement to promote and respect Islam and reconcile Islam and democracy. Coalitions of more secular, royalist parties have tried to smother it and the Islamists have found it hard to directly challenge the king because of his religious status as “commander of the faithful”. It too is seen by many as being in the pocket of the palace. The PJD here in Morocco is presenting the ‘third way’ between revolution and the uncertainty of the current system.

The toppling of long-standing leaders in Tunisia and Egypt at the beginning of the year is widely seen as having caught the Moroccan regime off-guard, at a time when the reform process had stagnated. As Morocco’s own protest movement took shape, a long-held taboo was breached. It’s the first time in Morocco that the king was openly criticized and they didn’t shoot people. Instead, the monarchy’s response was to promise changes including rights guarantees and more powers for the parliament. These were enshrined in a new constitution that was approved by referendum in July.

III – Observations

Maybe, the Arab World is in the process of changing but Arabs still don’t know the results and what will happen in Egypt, Tunisia, Syria or Yemen especially the destruction of Libya by the NATO-UNSC terror organizations. The moderately Islamist Justice and Development Party (PJD), which has been buoyed by the recent reforms, and by the gains Islamists have made elsewhere in the region, could win the election and so supply the next prime minister.

Leaders of Morocco claim they are presenting the way of reform without losing the stability, the unity of the country- but at the same time furthering the democratic agenda of Morocco.

Morocco’s ruling elite thinks it has skillfully sidestepped the revolutionary fervor sweeping the Arab world by offering a milder, more peaceful vision of change. Critics of the reforms point in particular to the fact that the king will still have wide-ranging executive powers, in particular control over foreign, defence and security policy. Activists also say the reforms will not end the behind-the-scenes dominance of the “makhzen” – a power apparatus of veteran politicians, powerful businesspeople, the security forces and royal officials controlled by the king through a system of patronage.

Morocco is bidding for membership of the European Union, its main trade partner, but there appears to be little enthusiasm for this within the bloc.

Morocco has been given the status of non-Nato ally by Washington, which has praised its support for the US-led war on terror. After deadly suicide bombings in Casablanca in 2003, Morocco launched a crackdown on suspected Islamic militants.

The message of a democratic agenda and gradual change is one that has gone down well with Morocco’s allies in the anti-Islamic US and Europe who promote pro-west leaders in Muslim world and destabilize the Muslim nations if the leaders do not buy CIA terror gimmicks…

Political and poll bribery is common. Sheep were being handed out to voters, and over the last few months, the protest movement has been subject to a smear campaign, arrests, and intimidation at the hands of shadowy groups of pro-monarchy thugs known as “baltaja”. But Moroccans say they will show the Western world that Morocco can bring about a gentle revolution and the nation can travel towards a real democracy.

In Morocco elections are never decisive as the king retains ultimate control and though parliament has more power, parties are weak. The electoral system is prepared on purpose not to let anyone succeed, so it’s impossible to get more than 20% of the seats in parliament and this is to allow the monarchy to dominate. The manipulation of the party system is just one of the old-fashioned tactics still being deployed to bolster the status quo.  According to analysts, the reforms passed this year are largely cosmetic, and there is no guarantee they will be put into practice on the ground. However, so long as it plays the NATO fiddle well, it has got nothing to worry.

Claims, fake or real, of descent from the Prophet Muhammad (Peace) by a few pampered Muslim leaders might be fashionable but are ridiculous if they decline to promote true Islam in the society. Moroccan king clams the same of being a descent from the Prophet Muhammad but he shamelessly sides with NATO terrorism and western anti-Islamism. A Muslim nation that promotes anti-Islamism and helps, directly or otherwise, the anti-Islamic GST rogues and refuses to promote Islamic way of life and institutionalize Islamic law on daily basis ceases to be a Muslim nation.  Muslim leaders in such societies are guilty of anti-Islamic crimes.

Elected premier Islamist leader Abdelilah Benkirane, though worships the king, has a responsibly constructive role to play in this regard so that Islam takes firm roots in the society. Americans, Britishers and other western terrocrats cannot help him or Morocco in this regard. Benkirane’s pro-people policies and their proper implementation would greatly benefit not just Muslims but entire humanity in some measure.

Muhammad praying at the Ka’ba.

——–
د. عبد راف

Dr. Abdul Ruff, Specialist on State Terrorism; Educationalist;Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA); Independent Analyst;Chronicler of Foreign occupations & Freedom movements(Palestine,Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc); Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than “terrorism” Anti-Islamic forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the world and they in disguise are harming genuine interests of ordinary Muslims. Global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by CIA  & other anti-Islamic agencies. Former university Teacher;/website:abdulruff.wordpress.com

Fragile Denuclearization: Russia steps up arsenal build ups

Fragile Denuclearization: Russia steps up arsenal build ups

-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

________________________

 

 

 

 

 

Denuclearization has remained a useless myth since it is purely utopian to expect the big nuke powers USA and Russia to renounce their arms arsenals, especially the weapons of mass destitution (WMD). While arms race is being propelled by these powers, the arms limitation talks are also going on, achieving literally nothing, while more and more nukes are being manufactured to terrorize the humanity on permanent basis.

 

Even arms control mechanisms evolved by nuclear powers are in fact meant to get rid of only the outdated or those reached the acutely dangerous level without having used them for too long.

 

 

Notwithstanding all treaties between USA and Russia, missile arsenals kept increasing in both countries, giving no chances for world peace. USA tops in warheads with 45000 warheads while Russia is second with about 40000 warheads and these arsenals are sufficient enough to destroy entire world in hours.

 

Americans also make Israel a nuke power by adding it more arsenals. Israel is now self proclaimed super power of Mideast, threatening the Arab nations and Iran.

 

Though both former Cold War adversaries have massively cut their nuclear arsenals since 1991, the data shows that over the past six months — a period that has seen Russia-West relations dive bomb over the crisis in Ukraine — both nations have boosted their nuclear forces. Although both nations increased their deployments this year, over the past three years they have moved in different directions: In 2011, Russia had 1537 warheads deployed — 106 less than now. The USA claims three years ago it had 1,800 warheads deployed, meaning it has decommissioned 158.

 

Since March this year, when Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine, Moscow has upped the ante in both regards, increasing the number of launchers from 906 to 911 and its arsenal of warheads deployed from 1,512 to 1,643.  According to US State Department report, with 1,643 nuclear warheads deployed, Moscow has now reversed 14 years of US superiority, and now has one more warhead in the field than the Pentagon. The report, which is released annually to monitor arms control efforts, has two key metrics — the number of individual nuclear warheads deployed, and the number of launchers and vehicles to deliver those warheads, such as intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) systems, submarines and bomber planes.

This has allowed Russia to achieve parity with the USA, which has showed less zeal in deploying new weaponry, growing its deployment of its nuclear warheads from 1,585 to 1,642 since March. Washington has reduced the number of its launchers from 952 to 912.

 

 

 

That is to say, maintaining the nukes for a long period of time is a big task.

 

The veto nations, having amassed huge piles of conventional and nuclear weapons do not want to disarm themselves but expect other powers to give up their nukes.

 

On the other hand, those emerging nations that want to go nuclear are eager to somehow enter the veto regime so that they can share the global wealth.

 

Nevertheless, not many nations   ask for dismantle the veto regime of UNSC so that credible peace could prevailed on earth.

 

Every nation is fearful of other nations having nukes in their arsenals.  Several treaties have been signed by nuke powers, especially by former super powers USA and Russia , but have never been implemented.

 

The ever-growing rift between the USA and Russia is a concern throughout the foreign policy community.

 

 

Arms controlling mechanisms evolved so far by big powers have only promoted the powers concerned and not worked to advantage of the humanity since no nuclear power is interested in really give up its nuclear and conventional arsenals.  In 1968, the USA and the Soviet Union hashed out their first arms control measures at the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT), freezing the number of missiles in their arsenals.  At that time, the USA had 1,710 missiles, and the Soviet Union had 2,347.

Although SALT attempted to curb the arms race, it did not address limitations on warheads. Both sides quickly realized that they could outfit their limited missile arsenals with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), allowing a single missile to deploy many nuclear warheads after launching. In 1986, President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev met in Reykjavik to talk arms reduction. On the table was a 50 percent reduction in nuclear arsenals and at one point Gorbachev even told Reagan he would eliminate all of the weapons if the USA were to ditch its missile defense plans. Reagan refused, and the arsenals survived, but the conference produced the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, which was the first to eliminate an entire class of nuclear weapons. Today, the INF treaty is under fire, with U.S. officials accusing Putin’s Russia of violating the treaty, and senior Russian officials openly mulling pulling out of the agreement.

In 1991, the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) was signed, limiting nuclear arsenals to 1,600 delivery vehicles and 6,000 warheads.  Over the next two decades, attempts to work out a START II and III treaty never panned out, but in 2002 Presidents George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin agreed to reduce warhead arsenals to 2000 warheads under the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (SORT, which is also known as the Treaty of Moscow). New START brought the cap down by a further 450.

However, these treaties have only applied to deployed weapons, and as such mask the still massive arsenals both sides have shacked up in storage. According to data from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, a global nuclear watchdog, the total size of the US strategic nuclear arsenal peaked at 32,000 warheads in 1966. The Soviet Union surpassed the US in 1978 and hit a high of 45,000 warheads by 1986. It should however be noted that these figures ignore technical capabilities and differences and don’t say much about the actual strength of each side. Russia still has 8,000 nuclear weapons, and the USA — 7,000.

Under the New START arms control treaty, which was signed into force in 2011 by Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev, the size of each nation’s nuclear arsenal is reported every six months. Although the treaty sets a cap of 1,550 nuclear warheads, it counts weapons on bomber aircraft as being a single warhead — meaning that each side may have a few hundred warheads over the limit. That cap is a fraction of what Russia and the US once aimed at one another.

 

 

Last month, Deputy Prime Minister of Russia Dmitry Rogozin said Russia’s nuclear forces — the backbone of its military might — would receive a complete overhaul by 2020 as part of the nation’s massive $700 billion rearmament campaign.  Moscow is pressing forward with its troubled Bulava (Mace) submarine-launched missiles, and new Yars land based intercontinental ballistic missiles and the uptick in Russian deployment mirrors advances in weapons delivery systems.

The dominant US narratives tend to stress the anti-democratic features of Russian politics, Vladimir Putin’s so-called dictatorship, his heavy-handed leadership, and aggressive foreign policy. The picture drawn has hardened during the Ukrainian crisis. The narratives point to a Russia that stands apart from the international community and to a president who cares little about this isolation and its political, security, and economic ramifications for his country.

However, US specialists do not compare Russian position as being very much equal to isolated Israeli position.

The current state of affairs in US-Russia relations is as distressing as it is alarming. By all accounts, this critical relationship has reached a point of rupture. In the United States, much of the discourse is centered on how to push back against Russia and President Vladimir Putin in light of what is happening in Ukraine. The answers stem from a set of narratives about Russia’s domestic trajectory, foreign policy objectives, and Putin’s personality.

Are dominant US narratives about Russia and Putin accurate, sufficient, and useful for guiding policy toward Russia? What are Putin’s objectives toward Ukraine and other post-Soviet states? What interests and assumptions are driving Russia’s policies toward the region?  Are there ideas that would help end the crisis that have been obscured by a hardening of attitudes in Russia and the USA?

Ukraine is only the recent issue between the Americans and Russians but there have been similar issues over which both reacted aggressively. Without  effective  denuclearization   or  verifiable  arms control mechanisms,  not only Ukraine  issue cannot be resolved but  more  complex issues would crop up in future too.

The dire consequences of an escalation of conflict between the US and its allies and Russia call for a debate in the USA that examines the basic assumptions that shape American super power  ideas about, and policies toward, Russia. It is no less important that Russians examine the assumptions that underlie their views about the West.

There is no commitment to improving the US ability to understand Russia and interpret its policies. Because prevailing narratives impact foreign policies, it is imperative to get the basic narratives right and subject them to continued scrutiny.

There is also no real US commitment to denuclearization globally. This is because neither USA nor Russia is keen to dismantle all its nuke arsenals.  USA wants all other powers to sacrifice their nukes and obey Washington.

Most Russians know that dismantling fo the mighty Soviet Russia was the work of USA and its  imperialist allies and  they don’t want  Russia to  be ready to be fooled by Washington again. Under the US command circumstances, Russia needs to worry about US intentions and secret operations targeting the Kremlin.

 

Indian Secularism: Kerala remembers C. H. Mohammed Koya

Indian Secularism: Kerala remembers C. H. Mohammed Koya

-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

______________________________

 

 

Muslims of Kerala state marked with profound sense of respect and admiration the 35th anniversary of C.H. Mohammed Koya assuming power as Kerala’s Chief Minister on 12th October 1979.

 

C.H. Mohammed Koya was the first and only Muslim chief minister Kerala state has seen and contribution to the state he had made during his brief period of CM position as well as a minister for long period has been admired by one all.

 

A simple function was organized in Thiruvananthapuram on 20th October as part of the anniversary programme at Trivandrum Press Club in which many important persons praised the simple person that he was but highly productive nature of work done by Koya for the people of Kerala. Prominent people of Kerala who had personal experience with Koya also dwelt about this infallible character and concern for the backward Malappuram region with poor people which he developed as new district. Today Malappuram is no less important than other districts.  Educational and economic levels of the region have improved stead fast, especially with Gulf jobs for them.

As the chief architect of modern Malabar and the force behind the establishment of University of Calicut, CH Muhammed Koya has done maximum for the uplift the region and people.  One of most sincere statesmen in Kerala, C.H. Mohammed Koya was born on July 15 1927 at Attoli of Calicut district as the son of Ahmed Musliyar and Mariyumma. His father was a countryside doctor and a specialist in Yunani Medicine. The family had to face many hardships in their life. At high School was his primary experience of politics. His child education from his father and mother and the primary education passes at Kongannur Aided Elementary School and next stage education was at Velur Mappila Elementary School and Quilandi Board High School. He was the one of the great and unmemorable leader in the Kerala Political History.

C.H. Mohammed Koya was an Indian politician and the tenth Chief Minister of Kerala. He served from October 12, 1979 to December 1, 1979. His term of just 54 days is the shortest term ever by a Chief Minister to this date. He experienced his first taste of politics right from his high school. He was actively involved with the IUML. In his early years, he served a short term in the Kurumpranad District Muslim League committee and later in the Municipal Office in Calicut. In 1951, he was elected to the National Executive of the IUML and shortly afterwards, was elected the Councilor of Calicut Municipality. Mohammed Koya was elected into the Kerala Legislative Assembly from the Tanur constituency in 1960. C.H. Mohammed Koya defeated K.P. Kuttikrishnan Nair of the Indian National Congress.

 

Seethi Sahib guided CH to this path, it was. He would do nothing without consulting him. Of course there is no doubt that it was Syed Abdur Rahman Bafaqi who raised CH giving him all the necessary essential of life. But who influenced CH intellectually was Seethi Sahib, besides Ismail Sahib (one of the founding members of Indian Union Muslim League). His chief mentor, both in personal life and political career, was Syed Abdur Rahman Bafaqi Thangal, to whom he was indebted for all his achievements. On June 9, 1961 he became the Speaker of the Kerala Legislative Assembly after the sudden demise of K.M. Seethi Sahib. He took oath in the name of Allah at the legislative assembly.

Despite being one of the youngest members in the Assembly, he was known for his charisma and the flair with which he discharged his duties. When Muslim league quit the political alliance at State level, Mohammed Koya resigned Speakership and contested the ensuing Parliamentary Poll successfully from the Calicut constituency. Again, in the State Assembly elections held in 1967, he won by a vast majority, contesting from Mankada constituency. He was the Education Minister in the cabinet headed by Shri E.M.S. Namboodiripad. He continued to retain his Education portfolio in succeeding ministries headed by C. Achutha Menon, K. Karunakaran, A.K. Antony till the Ninth ministry headed by P.K. Vasudevan Nair. As Education minister he was instrumental in formulating many plans that has helped Kerala reach the forefront in the education sector in India.

On October 12, 1979 C.H.Mohammed Koya became the Chief Minister of Kerala and his term continued to December 1, 1979. He was the Deputy Chief Minister in the next United Democratic Front (UDF) ministry headed by K. Karunakaran. Continuing in the seat even after the ministry was re-constituted in 1982, after the General Election, Koya stayed there till his untimely demise in the ensuing year, but could not become CM again.

CH Muhammed Koya was a good leader among minority Muslims in Kerala. C.H was the main architect cum founder of Calicut University. Northern Kerala was very backward in the educational field. The university was established to uplift its people and make them capable of facing the challenges of the modern life. C.H.Mohammed Koya Library is an Academic library, affiliated with Calicut University has a collection of 95000 volumes, promoting quality research. The C H Mohammed Koya Library in the campus of the University of Calicut and the Haji C.H. Mohamed Koya College for Advanced Studies under the University of Kerala at Thiruvananthapuram are named in his honour.

CH maintained good ties with the Arab leaders as well. It was following C.H.’s efforts that Arabic teachers in Kerala began to enjoy equal opportunities as their colleagues in government run schools and colleges. Former chief of Sharia Court, Sharjah said: “The history of Indian Muslims is incomplete without the name of Muhammad Koya” It is impossible to speak of CH without a personal touch because it was he who led me to active politics. I had never cherished a dream to enter politics. The only ambition in life was to become a lawyer. I would not say that he disliked me becoming lawyer, but he disallowed me. Whenever I would enter court, he would send for me. Once during a conversation, he asked me to enter the ‘Court of people’ than the ‘Court of law’. Some elders disliked the youthful fervor put forward by people like CH and me. We were trying to infuse new ideas and tactics. When criticism would take serious turn, I used to say to CH “why to enter these quarrels. Why not pursue a career in academics or profession?” CH replied, “My friend, tomorrow we are the ones to lead. How will that happen if we fear these old ones?” He was a true leader forever!

 

After the partition, many leading Muslim personalities, fearing Hindu fanaticism and anti-Muslim crimes, left for Pakistan. It was iron-willed choice of Seethi Sahib to stay back on his motherland that later paved a path for a political leadership for Muslims in India. Later when Jawaharlal Nehru asked him to dismiss the League, he replied in a convincing tone “I have no authority to do so” referring to the trust that the community had put in him. “Let us have a mainstream of our community and let us also have to merge that mainstream with the national mainstream, keeping the identity of our community as enshrined in the constitution” wrote CH when he was at Delhi. ‘What a quotable quote has Ch written’ exclaimed the colleague who read the letter. Once when he was the chief minister, the opposition leader said in protest, “Chief Minister, you should understand that we are sitting here as opposition”. CH replied, “Honorable opposition leader, I understand what you mean by ‘opposition’. But it is not right to say ‘sitting’ opposition because you are always ‘standing opposition’. The assembly burst in laughter. CH gave instant replies that sealed the lips of his opponents. Although many had differences political differences with him, everyone around him enjoyed his sense of humor.

Satire was the domain special to CH. His literary reviews were also full of humor. He brought to life the characters in the novels of Vaikom Mohammed Basheer- the legendary novelist of Kerala whose works have been translated to several European languages.

Unlike the hypocritical attitude of other political parties, Indian Union Muslim League never hesitated in declaring that it stood for the interest of its community. C.H was bold enough to declare this even in his short-lived Chief Ministry. He spoke thus while being the Chief Minister of Kerala in the assembly, “I am a sincere Muslim. I will not compromise on the privileges of my community. Nor will I snatch the rights of other communities.’

CH was persistent in fighting for the rights of his community. But at the same time he would not snatch what was due to other community. This is what CH taught us. He had to face great criticism even from his own circles. But at the same time he had a sense humor even while facing hardships. He would not leave anyone from criticism. Once there were rumors in the press about differences between him and then chief minister, K. Karunakaran. While talking to the press reporters, he said, “It is true that there are differences between me and chief minister. When having tea, he drinks it with sugar while I have without it.”

Whenever his community’s prestige was questioned, CH fought back with this pen and tongue. Once when he was the Minster of Public works, the opposition raised questions about the lack of construction of roads and bridges. CH gave a ‘befitting excuse’ to them saying, “I like to build them as soon as possible. But the honorable Chief Minister seated here does not require roads and bridges to travel. His car can go over any marshy paddy fields. But my fellow MLAs cannot do so” joked CH while hinting to the chief minister to speed up the concerned files. Even his own colleagues could not escape his criticism. The political sincerity that CH held was the path that Syed PMSA Pookoya followed, what Syed Bafaqi led and what Seethi Sahib preached. When the Communists government came to power in Kerala, the Vasudevan Nayar, the then Chief Minister, tried to lure to CH saying “CH! How long will you sit there in opposition?” He responded immediately saying “As long as you sit there (as ruling party), I will be seated here”!

Some Muslim leaders from Kerala had gone to Delhi accepting the invitation of Ms Indira Gandhi, the then Indian prime Minister. As they reached her home, they had to wait for some time. When they saw the children playing in the compound, CH intended to play with them. When others refused, he convinced them saying “My dear friends! They are the future prime Ministers of India”. How can we forget that simplicity of CH?

Anti-Islamic Hindus, among others who could not stand a Muslim becoming CM, had accused him of being a communalist. But the same accusers addressed him as the greatest nationalist when he died. Those who called him a radical later called praised him as a broad -minded politician.

Now the Muslim League functions as a subordinate party of the Congress party.

Koya’s help made Muslims deserving dignity and his good intentions and best wishes have kept the Muslims in Kerala in good stead, though prospering in Mideast and in turn making Kerala economically strong. His Honesty and Public awareness is very popular and well known to all Kerala. He was the representative of the Indian Union Muslim League.

In pursuing as a national policy of secular, democratic India to deny Muslims any chances for becoming Premier and Chief-ministers, Kerala political parties and leaders promote only non-Muslims to become chief ministers of the state, while they deliberately and very tactfully oppose any Muslim leaders becoming chief minister.

Today, Muslim leaders are available in the ruling Congress party to be considered for promotion as chief minister but for some bogus and vague Hindutva reasons the party leadership refuses any senior Muslim leader to assume chief-minstership. Besides, the Muslim League (AIML) which is a collation partner of ruling UDF with second largest MLAs to sustain the government against the LDFs  rigorous efforts to  win over a couple of MLAs to pull down the Congress led government. However, the Muslim League does not resort to blackmail tactics to get from UDF at least Deputy CM post which legitimately deserves.

Parliament could pass a law to make a minority member Deputy CM, if Hindu leader is the CM so that Muslim leaders also get a chance to become CM in due course. Secular democracy is not joke. .

Koya died on September 28 at the Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad in 1983.

Before death, Mohammed Koya served the cause of Kerala state, its poor people, development of backward regions.  Muslims in the state gradually got empowered by his compassion towards the poor.  By founding Calicut University in Malappuram, he helped the poor Muslims also to get educated in order to make a better living.

May Allah enlighten his grave!

____________________________________

*د. عبد راف *

Educationist, Prolific writer, Specialist on State Terrorism; Chronicler of Foreign occupations &
Freedom movements (Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan,
Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc.) Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International
Affairs(CIA);  Commentator  on world affairs & sport fixings, Expert on
Mideast Affairs, university teacher; Author of books/ebooks; Editor.

 

Kerala remembers C. H. Mohammed Koya

Kerala remembers C. H. Mohammed Koya

-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

______________________________

 

Muslims of Kerala state marked with profound sense of respect and admiration the 35th anniversary of C.H Mohammed Koya assuming power in Kerala’s Chief Minister on 12th October 1979.

 

C.H Mohammed Koya was the first and only Muslim chief minister Kerala state has seen and contribution to the state he had made during his brief period of CM position as well as a minister for long period has been admired by one all.

 

A simple function was organized in Thiruvananthapuram on 20th October as part of the anniversary programme at Trivandrum Press Club in which many important persons praised the simple person that he was but highly productive nature of work done by Koya for the people of Kerala. Prominent people of Kerala who had personal experience with Koya also dwelt about this infallible character and concern for the backward Malappuram region with poor people which he developed as new district. Today Malappuram is no less important than other districts.  Educational and economic levels of the region have improved stead fast, especially with Gulf jobs for them.

As the chief architect of modern Malabar and the force behind the establishment of University of Calicut, CH Muhammed Koya has done maximum for the uplift the region and people.  As one most sincere statesmen in Kerala, C.H. Mohammed Koya was the son of Ahmed Musliyar and Mariyumma. He was born on July 15 1927 at Attoli of Calicut district. His father was a countryside doctor and a specialist in Yunani Medicine. The family had to face many hardships in their life. At high School was his primary experience of politics. His chief mentor, both in personal life and political career, was Syed Abdur Rahman Bafaqi Thangal, to whom he was indebted for all his achievements. He took oath in the name of Allah at the legislative assembly.

C.H. Mohammed Koya was an Indian politician and the tenth Chief Minister of Kerala. He served from October 12, 1979 to December 1, 1979. His term of just 54 days is the shortest term ever by a Chief Minister to this date. He experienced his first taste of politics right from his high school. He was actively involved with the IUML. In his early years, he served a short term in the Kurumpranad District Muslim League committee and later in the Municipal Office in Calicut. In 1951, he was elected to the National Executive of the IUML and shortly afterwards, was elected the Councilor of Calicut Municipality. Mohammed Koya was elected into the Kerala Legislative Assembly from the Tanur constituency in 1960. C.H. Mohammed Koya defeated K.P. Kuttikrishnan Nair of the Indian National Congress. His chief mentor, both in his personal life and political career was Syed Abdur Rahman Bafaqi Thangal, to whom he was indebted for all his achievements. On June 9, 1961 he became the Speaker of the Kerala Legislative Assembly after the sudden demise of K.M. Seethi Sahib. Despite being one of the youngest members in the Assembly, he was known for his charisma and the flair with which he discharged his duties. When Muslim league quit the political alliance at State level, Mohammed Koya resigned Speakership and contested the ensuing Parliamentary Poll successfully from the Calicut constituency . Again, in the State Assembly elections held in 1967, he won by a vast majority, contesting from Mankada constituency. He was the Education Minister in the cabinet headed by Shri E.M.S. Namboodiripad. He continued to retain his Education portfolio in succeeding ministries headed by C. Achutha Menon, K. Karunakaran, A.K. Antony till the Ninth ministry headed by P.K. Vasudevan Nair. As Education minister he was instrumental in formulating many plans that has helped Kerala reach the forefront in the education sector in India.

On October 12, 1979 C.H.Mohammed Koya became the Chief Minister of Kerala and his term continued to December 1, 1979. He was the Deputy Chief Minister in the next United Democratic Front(UDF) ministry headed by K.Karunakaran. Continuing in the seat even after the ministry was re-constituted in 1982, after the General Election, Koya stayed there till his untimely demise in the ensuing year, but could not become CM again.

CH Muhammed Koya was a good leader among minority Muslims in Kerala . His child education from his father and mother and the primary education passes at Kongannur Aided Elementary School and next stage education was at Velur Mappila Elementary School and Quilandi Board High School . His child education from his father and mother and the primary education passes at Kongannur Aided Elementary School and next stage education was at Velur Mappila Elementary School and Quilandi Board High School .He was the one of the great and unmemorable leader in the Kerala Political History. His Honesty and Public awareness is very popular and well known to all Kerala. He was the representative of the Indian Union Muslim Leegue ( Kerala state political party ) .

 

The C H Mohammed Koya Library in the campus of the University of Calicut and the Haji C.H. Mohamed Koya College for Advanced Studies under the University of Kerala at Thiruvananthapuram are named in his honour. C.H was the main architect cum founder of Calicut University. Northern Kerala was very backward in the educational field. The university was established to uplift its people and make them capable of facing the challenges of the modern life. C.H.Mohammed Koya Library is an Academic library, affiliated with Calicut University has a collection of 95000 volumes, promoting quality research. .

 

C.H. maintained good ties with the Arab leaders as well. It was following C.H.’s efforts that Arabic teachers in Kerala began to enjoy equal opportunities as their colleagues in government run schools and colleges. Former chief of Sharia Court, Sharjah said: “The history of Indian Muslims is incomplete without the name of Muhammad Koya” It is impossible to speak of CH without a personal touch because it was he who led me to active politics. I had never cherished a dream to enter politics. The only ambition in life was to become a lawyer. I would not say that he disliked me becoming lawyer, but he disallowed me. Whenever I would enter court, he would send for me. Once during a conversation, he asked me to enter the ‘Court of people’ than the ‘Court of law’. Some elders disliked the youthful fervor put forward by people like CH and me. We were trying to infuse new ideas and tactics. When criticism would take serious turn, I used to say to CH “why to enter these quarrels. Why not pursue a career in academics or profession?” CH replied, “My friend, tomorrow we are the ones to lead. How will that happen if we fear these old ones?” He was a true leader for ever!

 

Seethi Sahib guided CH to this path, it was . He would do nothing without consulting him. Of course there is no doubt that it was Syed Abdur Rahman Bafaqi who raised CH giving him all the necessary essential of life. But who influenced CH intellectually was Seethi Sahib, besides Ismail Sahib (one of the founding members of Indian Union Muslim League). . After the partition, many leading Muslim personalities, fearing Hindu fanaticism and  anti-Muslim crimes,  left for Pakistan. It was iron-willed choice of Seethi Sahib to stay back on his motherland that later paved a path for a political leadership for Muslims in India. Later when Jawaharlal Nehru asked him to dismiss the League, he replied in a convincing tone “I have no authority to do so” referring to the trust that the community had put in him. “Let us have a mainstream of our community and let us also have to merge that mainstream with the national mainstream, keeping the identity of our community as enshrined in the constitution” wrote CH when he was at Delhi. ‘What a quotable quote has Ch written’ exclaimed the colleague who read the letter. Once when he was the chief minister, the opposition leader said in protest, “Chief Minister, you should understand that we are sitting here as opposition”. CH replied, “Honorable opposition leader, I understand what you mean by ‘opposition’. But it is not right to say ‘sitting’ opposition because you are always ‘standing opposition’. The assembly burst in laughter. CH gave instant replies that sealed the lips of his opponents. Although many had differences political differences with him, everyone around him enjoyed his sense of humor. Satire was the domain special to CH. His literary reviews were also full of humor. He brought to life the characters in the novels of Vaikom Mohammed Basheer (the legendary novelist of Kerala whose works have been translated to several European languages)

Unlike the hypocritical attitude of other political parties, Indian Union Muslim League never hesitated in declaring that it stood for the interest of its community. C.H was bold enough to declare this even in his short-lived Chief Ministry. He spoke thus while being the Chief Minister of Kerala in the assembly, “I am a sincere Muslim. I will not compromise on the privileges of my community. Nor will I snatch the rights of other communities.’

CH was persistent in fighting for the rights of his community. But at the same time he would not snatch what was due to other community. This is what CH taught us. He had to face great criticism even from his own circles. But at the same time he had a sense humor even while facing hardships. He would not leave anyone from criticism. Once there were rumors in the press about differences between him and then chief minister, K. Karunakaran. While talking to the press reporters, he said, “It is true that there are differences between me and chief minister. When having tea, he drinks it with sugar while I have without it.”

Anti-Islamic Hindus, among others who  could not stand a Muslim becoming CM,  had accused him of being a communalist. But the same accusers addressed him as the greatest nationalist when he died. Those who called him a radical later called praised him as a broad -minded politician.

Now the Muslim League functions as a subordinate party of the Congress party.

Whenever his community’s prestige was questioned, CH fought back with this pen and tongue.Once when he was the Minster of Public works, the opposition raised questions about the lack of construction of roads and bridges. CH gave a ‘befitting excuse’ to them saying, “I like to build them as soon as possible. But the honorable Chief Minister seated here does not require roads and bridges to travel. His car can go over any marshy paddy fields. But my fellow MLAs cannot do so” joked CH while hinting to the chief minister to speed up the concerned files. Even his own colleagues could not escape his criticism. The political sincerity that CH held was the path that Syed PMSA Pookoya followed, what Syed Bafaqi led and what Seethi Sahib preached. When the Communists government came to power in Kerala, the Vasudevan Nayar, the then Chief Minister, tried to lure to CH saying “CH! How long will you sit there in opposition?” He responded immediately saying “As long as you sit there, I will be seated here”!

Some Muslim leaders from Kerala had gone to Delhi accepting the invitation of Ms Indira Gandhi, the then Indian prime Minister. As they reached her home, they had to wait for some time. When they saw the children playing in the compound, CH intended to play with them. When others refused, he convinced them saying “My dear friends! They are the future prime Ministers of India”. How can we forget that simplicity of CH?

Koya died on September 28 at the Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad in 1983.

Before death, Mohammed Koya served the cause of Kerala state, its poor people, development of backward regions.  Muslims in the state gradually got empowered by his compassion towards the poor.  By founding Calicut University in Malappuram, he helped the poor Muslims also to  get educated in order to make a better living. .

Koya’s help  made Muslims deserving  dignity and  his good intentions and  best wishes have kept the Muslims in Kerala in good stead, though prospering in Mideast and in turn making Kerala economically strong. .

May Allah enlighten his grave!

 

____________________________________

Onward march of BJP and pathetic fate of Congress

 

Onward march of BJP and pathetic fate of Congress

-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

__________________

BJP’s agenda for India is not to make it corruption or crime free but Modi has clearly stated his party’s primary goal is to make India a Congress-free nation. And BJP has begun to work towards that goal and poll after poll indicates that the BJP is not very far away from achieving its stated goal.

 

After the central government and Lok Sabha, now Maharashtra and Haryana have gone the BJP way as the ruling Congress party crumbled in these states. Congress party with its tallest political and governance experience is now seen literally shivering as its chief opponent BJP making steady inroads into Congress vote banks and the with swift gains of BJP against it, pushing it to wall sides, literally, has already made Congress party vulnerable about its existence in future as at least a prominent party. And BJP is gradually replacing Congress party as the largest political outfit in India.

 

Congress has lost power directly to BJP at the center and in two more states.  That the BJP could neck Congress party  out of  its dominant position in Haryana and Maharashtra, with astounding ease,  clearly shows  the BJP trend or Modi aura  Is not temporary a as it gained all this  on its own in Maharashtra and  Haryana.

The wrong strategy of making an innocent looking Manmohan Singh as PM last times, instead of Rahul or  Priyanka seems to have cost the party power and credibility as  Manmohan  while promoting the rich and corperates in India and abroad also  encouraged  actively rampant corruption leading to  scams.

Possibly, Sonia Gandhi took Manmohan as the luck person for the party and government with his blue color turban he wears as Congress pride and innocent look he sports. Now it is clear it not his luck but coalition tactics of Sonia Gandhi that kept the regime going for the full term.

The corperates that controlled Manmohan and his cabinet directly indeed belong to BJP which cultivated them for future purposes.

 

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has made big gains in the Maharashtra and Haryana state elections. The BJP won 122 of 288 seats in Maharashtra. This more than doubles its seat count in the state, which is home to the financial hub of Mumbai, but falls short of an outright majority. The BJP for the first time got majority by winning 47 of 90 seats in Haryana, which borders the capital, New Delhi.

Wins in both state have strengthened its position in parliament too. State elections determine seat shares in the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of parliament, where the BJP and its allies lack a majority. The BJP hopes for gains in a clutch of state polls between now and 2017 to get towards the majority it needs to pass most legislation without help from the opposition.

The 64-year-old Modi, a gifted stump orator, hit the campaign trail hard. He will be able to reap capital from the victories even though the BJP did not achieve its ambition of winning enough seats to rule Maharashtra alone. However, BJP has proven stronger than the traditional Siva Sena party.

BJP president and Modi campaign manager Amit Shah told reporters after most of the seats had been declared that there is still a Modi wave that is like a tsunami.

Though the results represent major gains for the party since the last state elections, the BJP’s share of the vote in both Haryana and Maharashtra was just down from the May 2014 general election, when it won the first outright majority in 30 years.

Both states, which voted on Wednesday, were formerly bastions of the Congress party that has long dominated Indian politics. As in the general election, Congress was decimated, and risks sliding into oblivion under mother-son duo Sonia and Rahul Gandhi.

With a view to further strengthening capitalist formations in India, Modi has already seized on exit polls giving the BJP a clear lead to shake up his economic team, replacing the top civil servant at the finance ministry and hiring U.S.-based economist Arvind Subramanian as his chief economic adviser. Modi  has his work cut out drafting an annual budget to encourage business investment and revive Asia’s third largest economy from a prolonged slowdown by February. His government scrapped diesel price controls and raised the cost of natural gas, giving market forces greater sway as it seeks to attract energy investment, boost competition and cut subsidy costs.

 

The Congress downplayed the electoral defeat it suffered in Haryana and Maharashtra, saying such developments are part of the democratic process. It now says winning and losing is part of democracy and the party has always maintained that we should neither go overboard on victory nor despair on a defeat. Many Congress leaders found fault with party vice-president Rahul Gandhi’s leadership and want Priyanka Gandhi’s to lead the party, but the leadership stresses that the faith of crores of Congress workers is in Rahul Gandhi.

Fortunately for the Congress party, there are no visible cracks in the ranks and files of the party since Most Congress people think that the setback purely temporary and their party would, like before, and come back to power in due course.

Fortunately for the Congress party, again, Manmohan did not campaign in the polls. Obviously, the Congress may not seriously want to introspect the poll outcome in order to reach out to all without hidden corporate, corruption or Hindutva agendas that was paramount or necessary.

 

However, neither the leadership nor the party functionaries and supporters are aware of the fast changing  political scenario  of  India  where BJP  and RSS have  come up strongly  riding on anti-Muslim   opportunities  the Congress party provided and on their own  the polls have been won and governments formed.

This situation is unique and never before happened.

 

BJP is clearly on its way forward. The communal Hindus in Congress and other parties would support the BJP agenda that don’t allow Muslims to become chief ministers or deputy CMs in secular India, except in Jammu Kashmir even where they, after making a Hindu Deputy CM, are now fighting for a Hindu CM as per Indian conventions.

The results, however, do not mean the people have already given a seal of approval to the Modi government over the past four months, or proved Indians recognise Modi as an undisputed leader of India. But the people have not rejected BJP’s unimpressive achievements so far, either.

 

The solid BJP win has also ensured and a funeral of a 150-year-old Congress party. People are still annoyed with hopelessly corrupt and insensitive Congress party which has ruined the national and it’s already weakened prestige and they have found BJP the only alternative to keep the Congress, founded in 1885 and led by the Nehru dynasty for four generations, and other corrupt parties at bay.

Non-BJP and non-Congress parties continue to enjoy the changing the political equations in the country without deciding to make a credible contribution to positively help the common people, to make India a real secular democracy. .

 

____________________________________

*د. عبد راف *

Educationist, Prolific writer, Specialist on State Terrorism; Chronicler of Foreign occupations &
Freedom movements (Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan,
Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc.) Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International
Affairs(CIA);  Commentator  on world affairs & sport fixings, Expert on
Mideast Affairs, university teacher; Author of books/ebooks; Editor.

 

Badminton: China sweeps Denmark Open

 

Badminton: China sweeps Denmark Open
-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

_______________

 

In a way to display their overall dominance in badminton sport, the Chinese have won in all formats of the game in Denmark on 19 October.

China duly accomplished a historic capture of all five titles at the Yonex Denmark Open this evening, stoutly withstanding the best that Indonesia, Japan and Korea offered as opposition.

In Men’s Singles, another chapter in the growing rivalry between Chen Long and Son Wan Ho unfolded in two engrossing games which could have gone either way. Son, who beat the world No.2 in the team tournament at last month’s Asian Games, was up 17-15 in the first game and 20-17 in the second, only to see Chen claw back with some risky and exciting shots. The 21-19 24-22 result in Chen’s favour sealed his title defence as he kept the crown he won a year ago. “This was not an easy win but I prepared well and took some risks in the second game,” noted Chen Long, who was planning a steak dinner to celebrate.

In Women’s Singles, Wang Yihan, former number one who prevailed over Wang Shixian in the same arena last October has lost to world number one Li Xuerui who had withdrawn from last year’s quarter-finals due to a bad skin rash, Li feels she has fulfilled the unfinished business in Odense Sports Park.

A distinct feature of China’s strategy was to work the shuttle around to find gaps in opponents’ defence. They may not have called it “revenge” but Xu Chen and Ma Jin exacted some satisfaction for their Asian Games loss to Tontowi Ahmad/Liliyana, beating the Indonesians 22-20 21-15 to take Mixed Doubles honours.

Already assured of the Women’s Singles crown – with two of the China’s finest battling for the coveted championship – the perennial powerhouse dismantled their rivals from other Asian nations; every match sealed in straight games. It was an emphatic performance that places the Chinese in the record books as the only country other than the hosts to sweep this esteemed tournament which is part of the MetLife BWF World Superseries tour. Begun in 1936, the Denmark Open featured all Danish winners in its first year and again in 1955. China came close to emulating that feat in 2005, 2008 and last year, taking four titles on each occasion. This time, they were not to be denied and even the Korean machinery of Lee Yong Dae and Yoo Yeon Seong in Men’s Doubles could not resist the force as China’s titans powered through Odense Sports Park, taking no prisoners. It took the wily veteran Fu Haifeng and Zhang Nan – better known for his Mixed Doubles prowess – to out-manoeuvre the usually resolute Koreans. For Fu, who has stood atop many podiums in his glittering career, it was a first in Denmark; his third time lucky having failed in two previous finals with two different partners. “I’m more experienced and he’s young and energetic so we complement each other well,” he said, following the 21-13 25-23 victory. “We played a magnificent match and I’ve very pleased to beat Korea and be a part of this Chinese team,” said the Olympic Mixed Doubles gold medallist, who has partnered Fu from January this year.

____________________________________

*د. عبد راف *

Educationist, Prolific writer, Specialist on State Terrorism; Chronicler of Foreign occupations &
Freedom movements (Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan,
Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc.) Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International
Affairs(CIA);  Commentator  on world affairs & sport fixings, Expert on
Mideast Affairs, university teacher; Author of books/ebooks; Editor.

Indian diary – 2 : Jayalalithaa release from Jail: Has Supreme Court gone wrong?

 

 

Indian dairy – 2 : Jayalalithaa release from Jail: Has Supreme Court gone wrong?

-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

_____________________
Supreme Court, the highest legal-justice delivery avenue for India,   has ordered the release of ex-chief minister of Tamil Nadu Jayalalithaa by quashing the orders of Bangalore High Court.  The release of Jayalalithaa who is known to have illegal assets by the Apex Court has given rise to questions about the role and place of institutional rampant corruption in India, especially at higher levels.

For a country which is  reeling under the  heavy weight of  bribery cash and black money and money laundering against which even the BJP government is unable to  take punitive actions, because all  involved people are big, rich and corperates, the financiers of political parties and  polls.

 

First, the judgment, looking like a hurriedly taken decision by the bench, has shown green signal to all top politicians and CM, governors, PM top central ministers to ahead with their wealth making spree.  It clearly vindicates the hunch that if the case is handed by well known top lawyer any case could be won.

 

The fact that judiciary can also be bribed is a matte r of shame.  Like president of India, judges also are exempted from  court cases against  them, not even  PIL is entertained in the  courts  against  big people.

 

Jayalalithaa employed Ram Jethmalani for Bangalore High court and failed to impress the judges. So she has hired a bigger and smarter lawyer Nairman to argue in Supreme Court and she got it. Even the government side prosecutors began supporting Jayalalithaa in the case of illegal assets.

 

Supreme court by its judgment has let people of Indian know that corruption is pro-nation. If so, why should ordinary officials are arrested and jailed for corrupt practices?  Is it also an entertainment for national awards?

 

Can big people who can afford to give big money to court as sureties, be released while those who cannot afford crores of rupees must stay in jail?

 

Judiciary need not to indulge in business in judgments.

A three-judge bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice H.L. Dattu stayed on October 17the four-year jail term sentence. Earlier, the special court Sep 27 had convicted Jayalalithaa in the Rs.66.65-crore disproportionate assets’ case and sentenced her to four years simple imprisonment, with a fine of Rs.100 crore.

 

Former Tamil Nadu chief minister J. Jayalalithaa was released October 18 from the central jail in Bangalore on a surety of 3 crores rupees after a Bangalore special court ordered her release October 17, a day after the Supreme Court granted her bail. The court also issued separate orders to release Jayalalithaa’s three associates — Sasikala Natarajan, V. Sudhakaran and J. Elavarisi, after they furnished a bond of Rs.1 crore each and gave sureties as sought.

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister O. Pannerselvam, a few cabinet ministers and the ruling AIADMK’s lawmakers were at the prison to receive her. Hundreds of fans and party cadres gathered near the jail to greet her. She drove down to the old airport in the city’s eastern suburb to fly back to Chennai, about 350 km from Bangalore here.

Jayalalithaa’s lawyer Nariman submitted to the judge a certified copy of the apex court order suspending her four-year jail term and granting interim bail till Dec 18. The special court ordered her release.

When Jayalalithaa was arrested and put in jail, her party ransacked Tamil Nadu by misusing the party cadres to create disruptions and unruly scenes across the state and in bordering areas of neighboring states. Law and order of the state became jungle rules dictated by the party thugs. Jayalalithaa deliberately let that happen so that sympathy for hr as unique leader of Tamil Nadu could be generated in judiciary too.

Generally common people of Tamil Nadu are encouraged to think that Jayalalithaa has bribed them with some freebies and they must rise to the “occasion” to protest against judiciary that has punished their great leader.  People should be told that Jayalalithaa is not offering freebies out of her wealth but from the government.

Judiciary should consider this special case of popular bribery out of state resources for votes.

Partiality in favor of the rich and corporate is not a good approach or attitude of any credible judiciary. When Indian Supreme Court that has multiple feathers in its cap, ordered the release of a top corrupt leader like Jayalalithaa by cancelling the judgments of both special court investigating Jayalalithaa’s illegal deeds and Bangalore High Court, it has only undermined its own  prestige.

Supreme Court could consider if corruption bribes etc could be treated and declared by the Apex Court as patriotic deeds so that the intelligence and other agencies can focus on other problems India faces. This will make those who make wealth by illegal and immoral means, especially by bribery and corrupt means.

In that case, not only Jayalalithaa, but also ordinary officials and mafias could feel free to operate, doing their “business” as usual without any fear of government or officials.

Indian judiciary need not  let a real guilty escape like this.

As of now, in staying the Bangalore high Court order against Jayalalithaa on illegal assets case and also releasing her from jail from Bengaluru , the Apex Court, strangely enough, is trying to endorse shameless corruption at higher levels.

That is neither good for the people of Tamil Nadu and India  nor  for any civilized nation!

Indian judiciary is expected to show the real power of jurisprudence and genuine justice delivery to the world.

 

 

(to continue)

____________________________________

Indian Diary -1: Karnataka government must transfer Madani to Kerala

 

 

Indian Diary -1: Karnataka government must transfer Madani to Kerala

-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

_____________________

 

Time is overdue for Indian government to scrap all bogus cases filed by all state governments (possibly on instructions from central government) against Abdul Nassar Madani who is suffering now having been attached to a Karnataka jail, and release him with an apology to him and Indian Muslims for the conspiracy against him.

Before he was taken to Bangalore jail in order essentially to terrorize Muslims in Karnataka and Kerala, Madani had been in Kerala and Tamil Nadu jails for 10 years before he was acquitted by special courts from all bogus cases.

Of course, Madani cannot, unlike Jayalalithaa, pay crores to courts to get his release from all bogus cases slapped on him as“revenge” without any real crimes.

In order to promote the self-interest of former Tamil Nadu chief minister Jayalalithaa Karnataka government has asked the courts to transfer jail term to Tamil Nadu so that Karnataka government felt relieved and relaxed.

It seems it was a tactic by Karnataka government to promote the possibility of release of Jayalalithaa from jail altogether and its seems the Supreme court has taken cognizance of the Karnataka government need while deciding to release her in bail and stay her case in which Special Court and Karnataka high Court had given her a 4 year jail term.

Law and rules should be same for all citizens and because Jayalalithaa  was CM  the law should not bend too much and  because Abdul Nassar Madani,  undergoing  jail term in Bangalore , not knowing for what exactly he is being pushed for by prolonging the trial endlessly. .

Governments of Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka and of course the central government have jointly played  their usual anti-Muslim mischief in the form of terrorizing  Madani  and very drastically ,  harming his heath ( his eye sight is  spoilt by  roguish attitude of these governments towards an ordinary Islamic priest turned political leader)   because of continuous jail terms and  torture  by jail  guys.

One who tried to defend Muslims in Kerala, targeted by Hindutva forces, Madani has been the victim of conspiracy by Indian state as the Hindutva criminal forces axed his leg in a blast at his Madrassa in Kollam, Kerala. Later, instead of punishing the Hindu criminals (who perhaps are considered as the state guests) Madani was taken to jail.

Many of supporter sand well wishers keep visiting Madani in Bangalore. His presence, unlike Jayalalithaaa’s, has never been a law and order problem to Karnataka police. His followers and  friends, well wishers are  law abiding and peace lovers.

Karnataka government, being molded by Hindutva ideology, must end its traditional hatred for Muslims and either release him or transfer him to a  good jail in Kerala, his home state.  Kerala government can also keep an eye on him until he finally gets released from jail.

Kerala government should make a request to in this regard to Karnataka government and courts.

Kerala government cannot ignore Madani and promote those foreign Malayalees who regularly send money to Kerala to make the state more advanced than the neighboring states in the prices of essentials.

Deriving sadistic pleasure at the perpetual suffering of an ordinary individual (Muslim) is not a healthy attitude of governments.

____________________________________

*د. عبد راف *

Educationist, Prolific writer, Specialist on State Terrorism; Chronicler of Foreign occupations &
Freedom movements (Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan,
Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc.) Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International
Affairs(CIA);  Commentator  on world affairs & sport fixings, Expert on
Mideast Affairs, university teacher; Author of books/ebooks; Editor.

Can Anna Hazare achieve Lokpal without entering politics?


Can Anna Hazare achieve Lokpal without entering politics?

-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

_____________________

Anna Hazare, social activist who spearheaded anti-corruption movement, badly affecting the  political fortunes of India’s largest political party Congress  and therefore can boldly claim victory for bring the Hindutva BJP to power at centre and regional states,  is  now focusing on another aspect of Indian corruption –  black money and money laundering.

Though, it seems, Hazare was interested more in Bharatratna than nay real  anti-corruption scene emerging in India, otherwise, he should have realized that without  entering politics  he cannot achieve the political reforms in India where parliament and assemblies are controlled by corperates and  rich  people who  promote corruption as their key policy and even fund the polls and politicians.

Hazare said that during the Lok Sabha election campaign Modi had promised countrymen that his government would bring back black money in foreign banks “within 100 days”. However, the BJP is not sincere about its pledge made to the nation. The announcement by finance minister Arun Jaitley that the government cannot reveal the names to the public only shows the BJP is also shielding the anti-national corperates and billionaires who live as parasites, harming the  common people’s genuine interests, some of them maybe very important people in all domain, including cricket.

The people of India are suspecting if this was just an election stunt. Social crusader Hazare in a strongly worded letter demanded that Prime Minister Narendra Modi fulfilled his poll promise of bringing back money stashed abroad, failing which he would launch an agitation. Hazare said: “Now, it is over five months since your government took office but no concrete steps have been taken in this regard, as also the appointment of Lokpal. I am pained to say there is a wide gap between your words and deeds. Now people of the country are wondering whether all this was just an election gimmick to gather votes”. Though a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was set up on the issue of bringing back money stashed abroad, Hazare said the government telling the Supreme Court that it could not reveal the names of people with money in foreign banks has shocked all.

The veteran activist visited Punjab, Haryana, Uttrakhand, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh during his ‘Jantantra Yatra’ to push for a strong Lokpal Bill. But he should know without political power nothing could be achieved in India. He added that the country needed the Lokpal Bill and not communalism as it would divide the society.

The past 67 years’ experience has shown the people that mere speeches don’t bring about change, words and deeds have to match. Appealing on behalf of all countrymen, Hazare urged Modi to adopt a stern approach on this issue failing which he would “not hesitate to launch an agitation”.

 

Social activist Anna Hazare said he had never praised Modi said that Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi was not communal. He added that Modi never condemned the Godhra riots when many Muslims were murdered to boost the BJP image as anti-Muslim party in harsh words.

Had he been sincere he would have floated a party to help the people of India to have corruption free nation. Hazare the anti-graft crusader not only refused to enter politics but even made it clear that he would not support any political party or leader. He opposed his colleague Arvind Kejriwal’s AAP and for no reason even quickly supported Mamata Banerjee.

By refusing to join politics, or floating a new party or supporting the Aam Aadmi party, Anna Hazare in fact let the BJP get full advantages from his anti-corruption movement that essentially targeted the Congress party. And, BJP that sought right momentum to push through its political strategy, has now won polls . the trend continues in Haryana a where the ruling Congress party has been eased out and  won maximum seats by removing the Congress-NCP from power and outsmarting the Maratha party Siva Sena who claims to  the custodians of Maharashtra.

Obviously, Hazare now views not Congress but the BJP as his main target for future agitations.

 
____________________________________

Jayalalithaa release from Jail: Has Supreme Court gone wrong?

 

Jayalalithaa release from Jail: Has Supreme Court gone wrong?

-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

_____________________
Supreme Court, the highest legal-justice delivery avenue for India,   has ordered the release of ex-chief minister of Tamil Nadu Jayalalithaa by quashing the orders of Bangalore High Court.  The release of Jayalalithaa who is known to have illegal assets by the Apex Court has given rise to questions about the role and place of institutional rampant corruption in India, especially at higher levels.

For a country which is  reeling under the  heavy weight of  bribery cash and black money and money laundering against which even the BJP government is unable to  take punitive actions, because all  involved people are big, rich and corperates, the financiers of political parties and  polls.

 

First, the judgment, looking like a hurriedly taken decision by the bench, has shown green signal to all top politicians and CM, governors, PM top central ministers to ahead with their wealth making spree.  It clearly vindicates the hunch that if the case is handed by well known top lawyer any case could be won.

 

The fact that judiciary can also be bribed is a matte r of shame.  Like president of India, judges also are exempted from  court cases against  them, not even  PIL is entertained in the  courts  against  big people.

 

Jayalalithaa employed Ram Jethmalani for Bangalore High court and failed to impress the judges. So she has hired a bigger and smarter lawyer Nairman to argue in Supreme Court and she got it. Even the government side prosecutors began supporting Jayalalithaa in the case of illegal assets.

 

Supreme court by its judgment has let people of Indian know that corruption is pro-nation. If so, why should ordinary officials are arrested and jailed for corrupt practices?  Is it also an entertainment for national awards?

 

Can big people who can afford to give big money to court as sureties, be released while those who cannot afford crores of rupees must stay in jail?

 

Judiciary need not to indulge in business in judgments.

A three-judge bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice H.L. Dattu stayed on October 17the four-year jail term sentence. Earlier, the special court Sep 27 had convicted Jayalalithaa in the Rs.66.65-crore disproportionate assets’ case and sentenced her to four years simple imprisonment, with a fine of Rs.100 crore.

 

Former Tamil Nadu chief minister J. Jayalalithaa was released October 18 from the central jail in Bangalore on a surety of 3 crores rupees after a Bangalore special court ordered her release October 17, a day after the Supreme Court granted her bail. The court also issued separate orders to release Jayalalithaa’s three associates — Sasikala Natarajan, V. Sudhakaran and J. Elavarisi, after they furnished a bond of Rs.1 crore each and gave sureties as sought.

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister O. Pannerselvam, a few cabinet ministers and the ruling AIADMK’s lawmakers were at the prison to receive her. Hundreds of fans and party cadres gathered near the jail to greet her. She drove down to the old airport in the city’s eastern suburb to fly back to Chennai, about 350 km from Bangalore here.

 

Jayalalithaa’s lawyer Nariman submitted to the judge a certified copy of the apex court order suspending her four-year jail term and granting interim bail till Dec 18. The special court ordered her release.

When Jayalalithaa was arrested and put in jail, her party ransacked Tamil Nadu by misusing the party cadres to create disruptions and unruly scenes across the state and in bordering areas of neighboring states. Law and order of the state became jungle rules dictated by the party thugs. Jayalalithaa deliberately let that happen so that sympathy for hr as unique leader of Tamil Nadu could be generated in judiciary too.

Generally common people of Tamil Nadu are encouraged to think that Jayalalithaa has bribed them with some freebies and they must rise to the “occasion” to protest against judiciary that has punished their great leader.  People should be told that Jayalalithaa is not offering freebies out of her wealth but from the government.

Judiciary should consider this special case of popular bribery out of state resources for votes.

Partiality in favor of the rich and corporate is not a good approach or attitude of any credible judiciary. When Indian Supreme Court that has multiple feathers in its cap, ordered the release of a top corrupt leader like Jayalalithaa by cancelling the judgments of both special court investigating Jayalalithaa’s illegal deeds and Bangalore High Court, it has only undermined its own  prestige.

Supreme Court could consider if corruption bribes etc could be treated and declared by the Apex Court as patriotic deeds so that the intelligence and other agencies can focus on other problems India faces. This will make those who make wealth by illegal and immoral means, especially by bribery and corrupt means.

In that case, not only Jayalalithaa, but also ordinary officials and mafias could feel free to operate, doing their “business” as usual without any fear of government or officials.

 

 

(to continue)

______________________

Have you found nukes in Iraq, Mr President Obama?

Have you found nukes in Iraq, Mr President Obama?

-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

___________________________

Much before the Sept-11 hoax was engineered and  launched perfectly in new York,  the US leadership had made entire global media totally pro-US and and Islamic with a known CIA operative Osama  bin Laden was encouraged by US-Saudi twins  to insult Islam by terrorizing the world. Upon successful  accomplishment of Sept-11 hoax,  Osama was airlifted to an Islamizing Afghanistan to advance America’s energy agenda in Mideast. Arab – US collaboration, both covert and overt,  is  a known matter.

Media remain the backbone of  US terror strategy being executed in perfection. Without wholesale support of global media lords, America could not have achieved everything that has come now into US credit. Even state terrorism  has been made looks as a part of private  terrorism.

With media support, Americans have made  lies look like truth and facts while  truth is suppressed  and hidden very efficiently.

Humanity is cheated by th media as people are coerced to accept lies as foundations of truth. That  in fact is the basics of US democracy.

Barrack Obama is , like Bush Jr,  is very much committed to US imperialism and  illegal resource hunts. he just follows and even escalates the  US illegal wars for resources and blood with more vigor.

 

USA, the only super power which is the most developed nation on earth with high precision technology cum terror goods, nukes inclusive, always employs fake threat perceptions against its “perceived” enemies, for advancing its so-called global interest as national interest.

And the GAM (global anti-Islamic media) very skillfully plays with fear gimmicks to make the fake threat perceptions appear to be a reality so that USA-NATO could go ahead with its planned terror wars on Islamic nations, to slash Muslim populations and loot their resources.

 

 

From Afghanistan to Syria USA could easily invade the Muslim nations by spreading lies and making falsehood look real.

 

Americans invaded Afghanistan in 2001  on fake Sept-11 hoax by coercing Pakistan to let the military pass through that Muslim nation that get military aid from Washington, saying one Osama was hiding inside that Islamizing nation.  NATO rogue n militaries not only used Pakistan as a battle field to kill Muslims but also made it a safe haven for their secret operations against Pakistanis with help from Pakistani military and intelligence wings. Millions of Muslims have been murdered in Pakistan and Afghanistan and yet, US blood suckers aren’t fully satisfied.

 

USA that controls the notorious UNSC, the USA could manage permission of that organization to justify its crimes in the strategically important country in South Asia.

 

Led by George W. Bush , USA invaded Iraq in 2003 on the pretext that Saddam Hussein is hiding  WMD (weapons of mass destruction)  inside the country  and the USA claimed responsibility to locate and dismantle the Iraqi WMD.

 

Even after years of joint NATO attacks, destructions and genocides in Iraq  the world has no information about Iraqi nukes.
Recent media reports reveal that although the George W. Bush employed false claims of an active chemical weapons program to justify its 2003 invasion of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq– the reality is that some degraded stockpiles of weapons did exist inside the country. But there was no such nuke program existed in Iraq under President Saddam Hussein. Reports show how the only chemical weapons found in Iraq had been long-abandoned stockpiles dating back to the 1980’s but they don’t in any way conform to the pre-invasion narrative used by the Bush regime to justify the war.

The USA and other western nations were acting as an ally to Iraq and supplying weapons and chemical agents to Hussein during his war against Iran and those “abandoned” weapons dated back to the 1980’s and had nothing to do with Iraqi program.

USA very tactfully engineered chemical munitions in Iraq after it invaded it. Then, during the long occupation, American troops began encountering old chemical munitions in hidden caches and roadside bombs. Later, Pentagon claimed that 155-millimeter artillery shells or 122-millimeter rockets, they were remnants of an arms program Iraq had rushed into production with US assistance in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war. All had been manufactured before 1991. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all. Some were empty, though many of them still contained potent mustard agent or residual sarin. Most could not have been used as designed, and when they ruptured dispersed the chemical agents over a limited area, according to those who collected the majority of them.

In fact Saddam was not even aware of the US agenda for Iraq or the dangerous materials it had left behind in Iraq for future use.  Iraqi military was operating in tandem with the Pentagon and as such it inform Saddam what was “necessary” and as per the Pentagon directives.  USA troops who ultimately came across these weapons and were ordered to destroy them were told to remain quiet about what they’d encountered, even as it put their own health and those of others in grave danger. US soldiers who participated in the disposal of such weapons during the long occupation of Iraq said the Bush regime, including the Pentagon, suppressed the existence of them for several reasons, “including that the government bristled at further acknowledgment it had been wrong.”

The Bush gang needed something to say to legitimize the invasion and crimes it perpetrated in Iraq for years that Iraq had nukes and after Sept. 11 hoax Saddam had used chemical rounds. Global media ill-focussed on Islam vociferously lies about Iraqi nukes under Saddam command.

The discoveries of these chemical weapons did not support the government’s invasion rationale. After the terrorist hoax of Sept. 11, 2001, Bush bluffed, insisted that Hussein was hiding active weapons of mass destruction program, in defiance of international will and at the world’s risk.

United Nations inspectors said they could not find evidence for these claims. But Bush ignored that. In five of six incidents in which troops were wounded by chemical agents, the munitions appeared to have been designed in the United States, manufactured in Europe and filled in chemical agent production lines built in Iraq by Western companies.

Now the blame is conveniently placed on “intelligence failures” Very cool!

The American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find. As a result, what is new from this story is the US government under Bush was as cavalier about American lives as it was Iraqis.

Why then Obama regime also plays with “threat perceptions”?

The debate over the legitimacy of the Iraq War was never about whether or not Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction at some point in history. It may be so that Saddam Hussein used a variety of chemical weapons against Iran during the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s—and the USA eager to see the destruction of the nascent Islamic Republic of Iran, aided him in creating the program. So, it was a US program in Iraq, if at all. .

While Bush’s plea to the international community did not win the blessing of the U.N. Security Council, he used this rhetoric as the justification for invading Iraq and toppling Saddam Hussein. He was not declaring war on a decades-old chemical weapons program, but on a so-called dictator of Iraq Saddam who  until had been a nice boy to CIA who could destroy mass civilian populations. By 2005, CIA weapons inspectors concluded in a 92-page report that the WMD investigation had “gone as far as feasible” and found no evidence of an active weapons program. The CIA report included an addendum: “military forces in Iraq may continue to find small numbers of degraded chemical weapons — most likely misplaced or improperly destroyed before the 1991 Gulf War.”

So, in 2003 Iraq was free of nukes. No rationale, no justification for the US invasion of Iraq.

More and more Americans began suspecting war agenda of Bush Jr. Bush’s approval ratings, which peaked at 70% (never 100% as the US media lords wanted  the world to believe) during the March 2003 invasion, had plummeted to 48% by the time the CIA weighed in. White House could have used an example of, “Look, we were right!” But rather than tout the discovery of remnants chemical weapons from the 1980s, the Pentagon went to extreme lengths to cover it up. The harm these weapons posed to US troops was unanticipated and the injuries they were suffering were an embarrassment.

The existence of aging chemical weapons in Iraq that actually was the US-Europe design was never the justification for Bush’s invasion, nor was it a secret. The secret was the harm that they were causing to US troops and the subsequent failure to care for these individuals.

President Obama has a duty before the humanity  to declare the fate of  Saddam Hussein’s so-called hidden nukes. But as an obedient protector of US imperialist capitalists and Zionist fascism, Obama cannot be expected to be truthful, now or anytime in future.

Bush Jr and Obama Sr need to be brought to justice at the earliest for their crimes, committed individually and jointly,  so that world could be safe form conspiratorial  terror attacks and future of earth could be safe .

 

____________________________________

*د. عبد راف *

Educationist, Prolific writer, Specialist on State Terrorism; Chronicler of Foreign occupations &
Freedom movements (Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan,
Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc.) Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International
Affairs(CIA);  Commentator  on world affairs & sport fixings, Expert on
Mideast Affairs, university teacher; Author of books/ebooks; Editor.

Unfortunately, today there is not even one Muslim nation
today practicing  truly Islamic faith and life.
(Account: No 62310377429* -* CIF No:
78215311481- State Bank of Hyderabad, India)  Phone: 91-8129081217

_____________________

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 701 other followers

%d bloggers like this: