———————————————————
Indian regime has not yet paid me their promised money for my university services and it probably thinks it controls God and I should be helped only by God and not to ask the regime for help. Could you please apply some pressure and influence them and help me? I shall be grateful.
________________________________
Response of Climatic Criminal States to Climate change
DR. ABDUL RUFF
______
So, the Climate summit, like all other such summits, on climate change ended without any serious result. The leaders and their teams have departed home after joyful days with leisure, sumptuous lunches and sound sleep at Durban.
When the western terrocratic gang wanted to invade Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya or destabilize Iran, they went all out to pursue them forcefully and quickly, but when it comes to climate change they are in no hurry and say they have plenty of time to come to some real agreements, if at all they desire.
Global big rogues controlling almost everything on earth and space, including the notorious UNSC, NATO terror organization, international economic and financial institutions/agencies like WB, IMF, the global intelligences and judiciaries ICJ and ICC, interpol, etc, say one thing and do another, entirely opposite. They have the power and the will to do so. Entire world, especially the weaker nations, suffers due to the mischievous agendas of these rogue states. This situation enables the dictatorial regimes to bully and control the states that do not subscribe to whims of the big rogues.
Those climatic criminal nations (CCN) that pollute the air try somehow to enter the UNSC to shut the mouths of affected nations. NATO terror wars have further complicated and escalated the climate misbehavior. GST rogue states led by USA-UK terror twins still refuse to save one planet for the future of “our children and our grandchildren” in generations.
Outwardly, most nations appear to want a strong deal – but the exceptions are some of the world’s most powerful countries. There’s now a very visible high-ambition coalition that stretches across the developed world, in Europe, and the developing countries, and the real issue is whether those that have been reluctant to join in with high ambition are prepared to do so.
Like the parliamentarians in India do by shouting only to escape critical problems the nation faces, mutual accusations among the members, like elected members of Indian parliament do, are able to buy enough time. There has been little word from inside the Chinese or Indian camps as to how they currently see the negotiations.
World has never seen or will see progress in these fake negotiations behind which deals in arms-liquor as well as finances of NATO terrorism are struck by all nations, unless there is a progressive coalition of leaders from developed and developing countries who want action.
Final stages of negotiations often involve a few calls between heads of state that can sometimes break an impasse when their underlings cannot. But with EU nations desperately searching for a solution to the eurozone crisis at the Brussels summit, delegates questioned whether European leaders would have the time or inclination to make the key calls.
Issue
Island nations are under perpetual threat. A new analysis by a scientific group set up in the wake of the “Climate-gate” affair has concluded that the Earth’s surface really is getting warmer. The challenge the climatic disorder has thrown to the humanity has not got the sincere attention of global nations led by NATO, UNSC and other terrorist organizations led by USA-UK terror twins.
Many studies indicate that current pledges on reducing emissions are taking the Earth towards a temperature rise of double the 2C target. The agreement here has not in itself taken us off the 4C path we are on. Environmental advocacy group Greenpeace before the conference began urged world leaders to try to leave the USA on the sidelines given its perceived objection to a binding treaty regarding efforts to curb global climate change. There is a claim that many stations have registered warming because they are located in or near cities, and those cities have been growing – the urban heat island effect.
India, one of top three atmospheric polluters causing dangerous climate change threatening the existence of small island nations like Maldives, did not want a specification that it must be legally binding.
The roadmap proposal originated with the EU, the Alliance of Small Island States (Aosis) and the Least Developed Countries bloc (LDCs). They argued that only a new legal agreement eventually covering emissions from all countries – particularly fast-growing major emitters such as China and India – could keep the rise in global average temperatures since pre-industrial times below 2C (3.6F), the internationally-agreed threshold. South Africa, India and China criticized what they saw as a tight timetable and excessive legality. The conclusion was delayed by a dispute between the EU and India over the precise wording of the “road-map” for a new global deal. Eventually, a Brazilian diplomat came up with the formulation that the deal must have “legal force”, which proved acceptable.
A management framework was adopted for the Green Climate Fund, which will eventually gather and disburse finance amounting to $100bn (£64bn) per year to help poor countries develop cleanly and adapt to climate impacts. Management of a fund for climate aid to poor countries, as usual, has also been “agreed”, though how to raise the money has not. There has also been significant progress on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD).
NATO terror wars have made the climatic situation dangerously flexible and even worse that any permanent cause. By widespread convention, scientists use a minimum threshold of 95% to assess whether a trend is likely to be down to an underlying cause, rather than emerging by chance. If a trend meets the 95% threshold, it basically means that the odds of it being down to chance are less than one in 20. Last year’s analysis, which went to 2009, did not reach this threshold; but adding data for 2010 takes it over the line. Climate warming since 1995 is now statistically significant, according to Phil Jones, the UK scientist targeted in the “ClimateGate” affair.
Many countries undertake ecological actions that only add to the worry of island nations. In 2009, Brazil pledged to reduce the rise in its greenhouse gas emissions through a range of measures, chief among them a cut in the deforestation rate. If they work, emissions in 2020 will be about 37% lower than they would have been if none of these measures had been enacted. Deforestation in the Amazon is supposed to fall by 80% in the Amazon and 40% in the Cerrado. At the UN conference, Brazil’s chief climate official Eduardo Assad said that the country was already on track to meet about 65% of the target.
Brazil’s new Forest Code passed by the Senate means it will struggle to meet its targets on curbing greenhouse emissions. The move will also reduce Brazil’s global leadership on forests. It will reduce the size of buffer zones around rivers, and weaken the amount of land that owners must leave forested. Past breaches will not be punished if perpetrators agree to a plan of ecological restoration. Environment groups believe it will damage forests, rivers and wildlife. The ripples might extend beyond Brazilian shores.
Many other issues are on the agenda besides emission cuts. On the Green Climate Fund – the new body that will eventually collect and disburse sums of $100bn (£64bn) per year to poor countries – there is consensus on rules. The draft agreement for this meeting specifies that a levy on fuel used by international shipping could be one source of money for the fund. But progress on agreeing other sources is being blocked, reportedly by the US. On forests, there are genuine disagreements over technical and social factors. But there is also a chance that any or all of these issues could be held hostage as leverage in the bigger picture.
Claims of global warming have not been exaggerated. The Berkeley Earth Project has used new methods and some new data, but finds the same warming trend seen by groups such as the UK Met Office and NASA. The Berkeley group says it has also found evidence that changing sea temperatures in the north Atlantic may be a major reason why the Earth’s average temperature varies globally from year to year. The project received funds from sources that back organizations lobbying against action on climate change.
There was also the talk of action that helps cope with the effects of climate change – for example construction of barriers to protect against rising sea levels, or conversion to crops capable of surviving high temperatures and drought.
Environment groups are appealing to the EU to stand firm in its demands for a firm timeline towards a strong global deal, in return for which it is prepared to sign up for a second round of emission cuts under the Kyoto Protocol.
Scientists work for their funding masters in USA, UK and other big powers to manipulate the data. Critics alleged the emails showed CRU scientists and others attempting to subvert the usual processes of science and of manipulating data in order to paint an unfounded picture of globally rising temperatures.
The notorious UNSC stays away from the climatic disorders being propelled by advanced and energy hungry nations. This is as bad as a negative response to climate change is a serious danger signal.
Meanwhile, emails of University of East Anglia (UEA) climate scientists were hacked, posted online and used by critics to allege manipulation of climate change data.
The arrogance of the UN and global governments to think they can pollute the atmosphere and also effectively control the climate on the Planet is just astounding! Climate change, which is different from local weather fluctuations in all regions now, happens slowly over many thousands of years and has been going on since this planet was formed. Sudden climate change that happens over hundreds of years is not normal and the cause is usually mega volcanic explosions and asteroid strikes. The sudden climate change that this planet is experiencing is being caused by extra human activity.
Action that helps cope with the effects of climate change – for example construction of barriers to protect against rising sea levels, or conversion to crops capable of surviving high temperatures and drought.
The Standoff
More than 100 countries that gathered in South Africa over climate change issue are backing a plan that would set a 2015 deadline for a new climate treaty that would enter into force in 2020. The “powerful” BASIC group – Brazil, South Africa, India and China – held the line that talks should not begin before 2015, and should only take effect when current pledges on reducing emissions expire in 2020.
Lack of urgency in the Durban meeting halls for a political deal and pressing issues elsewhere threatened to block progress as the UN climate summit entered its final days. Some delegates said there was no clear process for bridging divides. Others suggested that the EU summit would see the leaders “thinking of the euro crisis, not the climate crisis”. Part of their argument is that discussions should start after the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has published its next assessment report in 2013-4, so that policy is based on the latest science. The UN climate convention (UNFCCC) itself is also due to review its existing agreements in 2013-5, to judge whether they need strengthening.
The EU has made an ad-hoc alliance with some of the world’s poorest nations to push for a strong deal here. The UK Climate Change Secretary Chris Huhne said UN climate talks were at a crunch point and countries must decide whether they want a treaty that can really curb global warming.
The EU said it is willing to put its existing emission pledges under the Kyoto Protocol, provided that the summit agrees a clear roadmap or process leading to a new global agreement under which, eventually, every nation’s emissions could be regulated. Europe called on USA, Chinese, Indian delegates to join a European proposal. Britain said the level of greenhouse gas emissions are rising very fast while the rest of the world focuses on economic uncertainty in the USA and eurozone. The US – which is well versed in the art of escapism and has been widely accused of blocking tactics – also said it supported the EU concept of a “roadmap”, but gave few extra details.
The US, India, China and Brazil are among those opposed parts of the solution sought by the EU and the majority of developing countries. As those four nations together account for nearly half of the world’s emissions, the diplomacy is harder than the mere numbers might indicate.
The top third world polluters Brazil, China and India also argue that Western countries should follow through fully on their existing pledges first before any new process starts – including by making further emission cuts under the Kyoto Protocol. Brazil has made clear that it does not want the process to begin until 2015 at the earliest, while China, India, and the US are believed to favour even longer timescales.
Aosis and the LDCs agree that rich countries need to do more. Western nations have not cut their own emissions as they had pledged. Countries labeled “developed” and others have to cut their greenhouse gas emissions. If there is no legal instrument by which humanity can make countries responsible for their actions, then the world is relegating countries to the fancies of beautiful words.
Observation
Coalition of the willing is at a work even at climate change issue. But the big emitters are holding out for a longer timescale. The grand show of UN climate “talks” has closed with an “agreement” which may or may not be put into practice. The EU agreed to place its current emission-cutting pledges inside the legally-binding Kyoto Protocol, a key demand of developing countries.
Nations at the UN climate talks appeared to be edging their way to agreeing that a process towards a new carbon-cutting deal should start in the New Year. However, most of them are double-speakers. There is clearly a broad coalition there that wants a process leading to a new, legally-binding agreement covering all nations to begin as soon as possible. It includes the Least Developed Countries bloc (LDCs), the Alliance of Small Island States (Aosis), the European Union and some countries in Africa and Latin America.
No big new treaty was agreed. Overnight talks appeared to have made little concrete progress, with big emitting countries sticking out for a new deal that would bite after 2020. The Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and the Alliance of Small Island States (Aosis) insist that the talks must begin in January and conclude at the end of next year. What the LDCs, Aosis and the EU are seeking is a firm timetable – a mandate – leading to a new treaty.
In one further forest development, seven African nations and eight western partners signed a Declaration of Intent on the Congo Basin Initiative, a plan to safeguard the world’s second-largest expanse of rainforest.
The fact of the matter is there should be very quick action. India has been accused of being one of the main countries blocking a progressive deal here, along with China and the US. The “firewall” marked in the UN climate process at its origin in 1992, which divided the world into Annex One – rich countries with commitments to reduce emissions – and everyone else, must be maintained.
A draft text circulated by the South African host government says the new agreement should be in place by 2015. All nations would be included, though the exact legal nature is not clear. The new version does not specify a date from which the new agreement should come into force. But it does for the first time explicitly endorse the fact that there is a mismatch, a gap, between the pledges countries have made on cutting emissions and their stated goal of keeping the rise in average global temperatures since pre-industrial times below 2C (3.6F).
The move marks a success for the ad-hoc alliance formed between the EU and scores of the world’s most climate-vulnerable countries. Most observers agree that the biggest question is whether China, India, Brazil and the US can be persuaded to move far enough towards the common ground shared by the EU and the LDCs and Aosis.
Talks on a new legal deal covering all countries will begin next year and end by 2015, coming into effect by 2020. Many delegates rightly said the host government of South Africa, a stooge of western terrocracies, lacked urgency and strategy. Earlier drafts had said negotiations should not begin until 2015, and should not take effect until 2020.
Confusions!
Pledges are made by regimes only to be floated eventually. Both the developed world and emerging economies are not living up to its promises. The climatic criminal states will need to cut their emissions several years in the future if governments are to meet their goal of keeping the rise in global average temperature since pre-industrial times below 2C.
The world is still waiting for the global dictator USA, Asian giant China, and South Asia’s terror colonialist India to get on board with a plan to curb global warming. The USA and others keep saying they are committed to finding a workable solution to climate change, but they are insincere. All they want is alien resources through illegal wars on fabricated pretexts only to strength their economies.
But the talk of a brighter future is vague because of lack commitment to the world peace and safe climatic conditions.
But one has wait and see the action by all concerned.
——–
د. عبد راف
Dr. Abdul Ruff, Specialist on State Terrorism; Educationalist;Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA); Independent Analyst;Chronicler of Foreign occupations & Freedom movements(Palestine,Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc); Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than “terrorism” Anti-Islamic forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the world and they in disguise are harming genuine interests of ordinary Muslims. Global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by CIA & other anti-Islamic agencies. Former university Teacher;/website:abdulruff.wordpress.com/ 91-9961868309/91-9961868309
Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal Blog 